What is the problem or goal the end user is trying to solve or accomplish?
Users want consistent and readable numeric formatting across all magnitudes when using Adaptive Number Formatting in charts.
Currently, values above $100M lose decimal precision (e.g., $104M instead of $103.9M), creating inconsistency compared to smaller values like $96.5M.
The goal is to maintain a uniform display precision so that numbers remain meaningful and visually aligned regardless of their scale.
How are they solving it currently?
They use a fixed format like .4s, which preserves decimals for large numbers — but this breaks adaptive behavior for smaller numbers (e.g., $1.000M when the value is only $1M).
In short, there is no good workaround: users must choose between inaccurate rounding for large values or awkward formatting for small ones.
What is the recommended solution by the Customer?
Adjust the Adaptive Number Formatting logic to retain at least one decimal place for values above 100M, or provide a configuration option that allows users to define minimum decimal precision for adaptive formats.
This would ensure consistent, accurate display across filters and dynamic dashboards.